- Previous
- 1 (current)
- Next
#42
The site is really nice and whatnot (keep up the good work!
), but you could add the following:- Advanced Forums (sticky topics, AJAX posting/editing, "Thanks" feature, sub-forums, currently viewing, topic preview, etc.)
- A couple of more forums (e.g. coder's corner, GFX shop, tutorials and how-tos, etc.)
- A wiki that could possibly replace both the FAQ and rules section altogether
That's pretty much all I can think of, however, I'm sure more will come in the future.
#66
@SPYROTEKNIKS great idead this will make site more good , hope staff will think on this topic !!
#88
Let me add just two.
On new trackers it's very important people have incentive to download, starting out with zero upload makes it very scary to download since the peer-count is so low. Give people a few GB to get started.
Also there is nothing in place yet to promote archive (long seeding) you might want to offer something to make sure you always have a few seeds on your content.
And this is of course too late now, but why didn't you guys go with Gazelle? Gazelle really proved itself as a great organizer of music, I see you build a lot of features custom that are stock on Gazelle.
Last edited by Hidden (1bc90138)
#93
SPYROTEKNIKS wrote:
The site is really nice and whatnot (keep up the good work! ), but you could add the following:
]Advanced Forums (sticky topics, AJAX posting/editing, "Thanks" feature, sub-forums, currently viewing, topic preview, etc.)
)
), but you could add the following:]Advanced Forums (sticky topics, AJAX posting/editing, "Thanks" feature, sub-forums, currently viewing, topic preview, etc.)
)
Ajax in-line editing of comments and forum posts are on the to do list.
Animazing wrote:
On new trackers it's very important people have incentive to download, starting out with zero upload makes it very scary to download since the peer-count is so low. Give people a few GB to get started.
The front page featured albums are now freeleech. This could help people gain a little ratio to throw around.
Quote:
And this is of course too late now, but why didn't you guys go with Gazelle? Gazelle really proved itself as a great organizer of music, I see you build a lot of features custom that are stock on Gazelle.
I preferred to take a more hands-on approach to the code. Gazelle is indeed a nice sourcecode, but it isn't too difficult to add any of the features it has to Panda. So if you'd like to see something in particular, please request it.
#112
Animazing wrote:
On new trackers it's very important people have incentive to download, starting out with zero upload makes it very scary to download since the peer-count is so low. Give people a few GB to get started.
The front page featured albums are now freeleech. This could help people gain a little ratio to throw around. [/quote]I agree with Animazing. While starting with upload GB's is not essential, you need to encourage leeching from the get go. Freeleech torrents help this, but I think > 3 freeleech albums onsite would certainly help things along.
- Previous
- 1 (current)
- Next